<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: readability?!#?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taspd.edublogs.org/2007/11/17/readability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taspd.edublogs.org/2007/11/17/readability/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:31:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Readability tool at CITAL-TAL FORUM</title>
		<link>http://taspd.edublogs.org/2007/11/17/readability/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Readability tool at CITAL-TAL FORUM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taspd.edublogs.org/2007/11/17/readability/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>[...] will have to up the language on this blog. Hat-tip Thinking 2.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will have to up the language on this blog. Hat-tip Thinking 2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dswaters</title>
		<link>http://taspd.edublogs.org/2007/11/17/readability/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>dswaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taspd.edublogs.org/2007/11/17/readability/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Hi Cindy - yes everyone is having fun with this.    Try the Readability Test at Juicy Studio (juicystudio.com/) which goes through the results (check out Paul Hamilton&#039;s post for comparison - paulhami.edublogs.org/2007/11/03/juicy-studio-online-resource/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cindy &#8211; yes everyone is having fun with this.    Try the Readability Test at Juicy Studio (juicystudio.com/) which goes through the results (check out Paul Hamilton&#8217;s post for comparison &#8211; paulhami.edublogs.org/2007/11/03/juicy-studio-online-resource/)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
